"HAVE NO IDEA?": NOW WANTS TO WORK TOGETHER. CHADWICK SCHNEE IS NOT THE SOLICITOR WE NEED FOR THIS TOWNSHIP! HERE IS WHY:

In my Opinion, As an Elected Supervisor of Exeter Township:

---

From: J. Chadwick Schnee <chadwick@schneelegal.com>
To:David Hughes
CC: David Vollmer; Michelle Kircher, ;George Bell;, Larry Piersol
Good afternoon, Supervisor Hughes. 

I caught your latest disparaging post. As I’ve mentioned more than a few times, I continue to have no idea as to how I ever drew your ire, and, as I’ve also offered more than a few times, I’d love to put aside whatever personal animosity you may hold for me and work together for the benefit of the Township and its residents. 

Can we schedule a time to sit down and hash this out?

Thank you.

J. Chadwick Schnee, Esq.
​Schnee Legal Services, LLC 
74 E Main Street #648
Lititz, PA 17543 

---

Here we go again with yet another baffling email from Chadwick Schnee of Schnee Legal Services. It's borderline comical how Chad consistently fires off these passive-aggressive missives, trying desperately to paint himself as some kind of martyr at the hands of Supervisor Hughes. The repeated attempts to alter the narrative - especially with the looming threat of legal repercussions - don't escape our notice. "Look at me, the innocent victim," he seems to cry.

Let’s cut through the noise: Chadwick, the evidence is overwhelming. Video after video reveals your open hostility and unapologetic condescension towards Supervisor Hughes. It's astounding how quickly you unravel when confronted by my truth-telling, revealing yourself to be less of the seasoned attorney you claim to be and more of a novice struggling to keep up. Your brazen attempts to rewrite history – particularly by misusing legal tools like attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine – are transparent.

​It's evident that you're trying to shield the Exeter public from whatever dubious dealings you're part of. And let's not forget your blatant use of board of supervisors resolutions as a weapon: propping up your shaky business, taking jabs at me, and even trying to silence and intimidate me and other Exeter residents.

Chadwick, drop the act. The curtain was pulled back on your charades long ago, and your reputation in Exeter Township - and the wider legal world - looks precarious at best.

---

Further, you Chad claim to have caught my latest "disparaging" post?

​Newsflash: I’ve been at the helm of exeterunited.com for years, consistently updating our residents about the happenings within our local government. Way back, I called out the blunders leading to the hikes in our sewer and water bills. While only a handful took notice, I stood firm. While my blog melds hard facts with personal opinions, you seem to believe you're the self-appointed referee of what constitutes as "disparaging".

And let's talk about that absurd clause in your contract, where you slap the township with a $1,000 fine each time you "feel" an employee or supervisor steps out of line on social media or blogs.

This isn’t legal vigilance; it’s EXTORTION.

I’m convinced that this clause emerged after I publicly rated your first-year performance as a 2nd class township solicitor with a failing grade. Did I hope for improvement? Absolutely. Did I get it? Sadly, no.

Let’s dive into the mystery that is your role, Chad. According to your oh-so-vague contract: "This firm has been retained to serve as the Solicitor for Exeter Township."

But when we reference the 2nd class township act, it clearly underlines that Schnee operates at the behest of the Board. Yet, here you are, brazenly drafting a "resolution" aiming to sidestep this very act, transferring power to the manager and yourself. Are you here trying to cure your misdeeds with Betsy McBride for the past 12 months?

Your contract further states: "The scope of our representation does not include advice or services regarding accounting, tax, personal financial matters, business management, and related non-legal matters and advice..."
And yet, you seem unable to resist meddling in areas way beyond your purview. Case in point:
​
Unsanctioned Acts:

1. Giving a legal opinion on Supervisor Bell's vendor donations during the primary election exceeding $1,000.
2. Voicing a legal stance on Supervisor Vollmer's vendor donations during the primary election overstepping the $1,000 mark.
3. Drafting an unauthorized legal opinion on "agendas".

Mr. Schnee, perhaps it's time to reacquaint yourself with your job description and act accordingly.


​