The Anti-community boards last meeting, watch as 3 not elected supervisors , Vinnie (tweedledum) Biancone, Jeff Anderton and Daron O'Donald voted and passed issues that could have waited for a fully elected board, they wreaked to wait by a newly elected board member for 2020 to wait, yet they went ahead and imposed Ms. Vanderlaan and John Grangers grand plan for us. Never mind that it has cost us millions of dollars. Not on the agenda was the surprise presentation of the RCC/JMH settlement, why wasn't it on the Friday posted agenda? They knew about it, they talked about it on Next-Door. The two of them Tweedledum and Tweedledee (Cusatis) are turning Next-Door into a cesspool just like Facebook. Well it looks like Cusatis, who second the motion to begin this fiasco and kick JMH/Viva out of the RCC because they supposedly broke a lease agreement has cost us about $4 million in legal fees, lost revenue and settlement costs. At least this is what me know so far. When you observe his arrogance and his condescending ways, "be your own voice" , and
"Make an informed decision and don't follow others."
"Do not listen to the noise of social media where it can cloud your judgement."
"When doing the research make sure to think about the entire community and what is best for the entire community."
"That is what it is all about. Ask the hard questions and make sure no one has an agenda."
" Make sure they have private sector, real world experience."
This is the rhetoric of a sick man. But here is the rub, :BUT LISTEN TO ME"
"TAKE MY ADVICE" "LISTEN TO MY NOISE" AND ON AND ON ad nau·se·am.
This will be John Cusatis' legacy..... We bought the RCC for $11.9 million and he just wasted $ 4 million on top of that!
Here are some more thoughts on this :
It must kept in mind, because it feels that we are too cavalier about this huge loss. This is taxpayer money, it represents about 15% of 2020 budget, also about equivalent to about the budgeted deficit of $1.8 million for 2020. I hope everyone reflects on this cost to our taxpayers, this could have been avoided. I for one, want a clear explanation, step by step, how this happened, who is responsible? How could this have gotten so out of hand? Well Mr. Cusatis you have so much to say...how about an explanation?
We should not just take this quietly.....we need to demand answers and identify who is responsible for this costly mistake? Add the legal fees, the lost revenue .....I think we lost about $ 4 million. How do we lose $4 million, and not raise taxes? In fact they cut taxes with the homestead exemption by about $800,000? I say something is still not right here? We lost $4 million and our fearless leader claims the loss is minimal.....oh my god! Johnny Cash had a hit record called "Get Busy" we as a community need to "Get Angry" How much good, how much would that $4 million could have contributed to our community? In so many ways!! What was it? Lack of leadership? Lack of experience? Immaturity? Greed? Hidden Agenda? Paying a township manage twice what any other manager in Pa. makes didn't help us in this mess? The other individual who is responsible for this resigned earlier this year.....we need to be watchful as the new supervisors move in...we need to keep that watchful eye at all times. Right Mr. Cusadist, you are watching out for us, yes?
The damage done by the boards since 2015 has devastated this township! This type of government does not work unless the public participants. If you have attended meeting and you have watched my opinions at here you see, feel and hear how this board of 2016 to 2019 have suppressed public inquiries and practiced intimidation so overtly that it amazes me still. More amazing is that few said anything, simply allowed this to sadly happened. This is one of the consequences.
I don't understand why we put any faith in this 2019 board or the manager!!! HE has been a disaster. If he is here after the first meeting of the new board you know we will still have problems in our community. Also, no current member of the board as chairmen, in fact we must insist no current board members should be sitting in that seat. IF there is...then we can have a situation where LV/JG is still in charge.
So, after the Jan. 6th meeting if JG is still employed by our township and either one of the two remaining board members is appointed chairperson we should be concerned that LV and JG still control our township. We don't want that, we don't need that, even the appearance ....we do not want. Our three new supervisors need to send a clear message to our community.....positive change and no one from the old regime should be put into a position of control!!!!
Anyone else agree with this?