NOT FIT TO LEAD: GEORGE BELL PREDICTABLY BLAMES HUGHES FOR HERBEIN LOSS AND OFFERS NO PROOF!

BELL blames Supervisor Hughes as the reason Herbein refused to continue as Exeter Township's Auditor. Makes a claim but provides NO PROOF! WOULD YOU HIRE A FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO PUTS HIS OWN AGENDA BEFORE YOUR BEST INTERESTS?

BELL & VOLLMER'S HATEFUL AND MALICIOUS SLANDEROUS ACTIVITY CONTINUES

​George Bell is shamelessly flouting every rule and regulation concerning public meetings. Bell, a so-called financial advisor with Fidelity Investments, is at it again, trying to pass off his glaring mistakes in our township's financial reporting onto the only responsible adult present. This clueless individual seems to be conveniently forgetting Article 2 of Public Meetings under 65-2 Rules and Regulations section D(3), which clearly states to "refrain from maligning others", and D(4)(C) that expressly forbids Supervisors from launching personal attacks or questioning the motives of their colleagues or staff members.
I urge you to scrutinize this short video clip closely and decide for yourselves: is this a blatant violation of the ordinance? Mr. Bell, who appears to live on social media—even when he should be working as an insurance salesman for Fidelity Investments—asserts he will verify all his falsehoods. What an immature imbecile. His constant deceit has us all questioning who, in their right mind, would entrust their hard-earned retirement savings to such a deceptive clown!
Pay attention to the Chair, David LEO Vollmer, who pretends to restore order on the Board while allowing this disgraceful conduct to persist. These two are nothing more than petulant children desperately in need of discipline. When I rise to a point of order, according to Robert's Rules of Order, the Point of Order should take precedence: the speaker must cease, and the chairman must inquire about the nature of the Point of Order. This is how RRO is meant to function, unless, of course, you're part of some pathetic high school clique hell-bent on silencing any opposing voice. David LEO Vollmer didn’t hesitate to quash it. What was his response? That my Point of Order is not recognized? I demand to see the evidence that Herbein withdrew as our Audit firm specifically because of my actions. If that is the case, why? What exactly did I do? The behavior of these two, Bell and Vollmer, who have hijacked the Board for over a year now, is nothing short of DISGRACEFUL! Below is Herbein's letter for your reference.

Why did this happen? Not because of what the board did, but what they did not do. Further details on what Bell and Vollmer did not do. Also, what Herbein may have done and should not have done.