Exeter, United.
"The more you tell lies about me, the more we'll tell the truth about you."
In my Opinion, As an Elected Supervisor of Exeter Township: This is it above, the letter/email from Schnee Legal Services to me claiming attorney client privilege and all that other CRP. But there is more to this that you need to know. Additional correspondence that Schnee Legal Services claims are also attorney client privilege. The RTK process is completed, deemed moot since I have the documents un-redacted. The videos attached are key to this charade that Schnee Legal Services continues to play.. video number one is where Schnee mentions the crime code. The joy he must have felt.... The second video is where he claims all of this was done outside of the context of my position as a supervisor and therefore I am not gong to be provided with legal council.....hmmmm Regarding second censure where they improperly (illegally) removed me from the meeting, Schnee says in this meeting that according to the crime code I should be censured. See the Video attached below. Schnee Legal Services being helpful.....which email? Could you be a little more specific? Still, this is considered by him as Attorney Client Privilege In the meeting Schnee was asked what did I violate? he specified the "crime code" and I am simply which section? See video 1 Schnee mentions Crime Code and subsequently his memory fails. Schnee does this often, pretends not to know in order to generate more emails at $21.50 minimum. Up above (four emails ) I asked him to specify which section of the crime code he was referring to...... All this occurred in an open meeting with regards to my discussion. Again, asked and ignored...this is the guy we are paying $45,000 a quarter...$180,000 a year. Spending much of his time on prosecuting me. Schnee is being his usual self here....I was not asking for legal advice....do any of you interpret my asking for what section of the crime code was he referring to I the public meeting as asking for legal advice? NO! What do you think of his line above claiming all future communications between the two of us will be protected by privilege? On another note, since the signing of the Kozloff Stoudt agreement where he pawns off the obligation and the action to a third party...note in the meeting where this was adopted he claims n these conversations and release of the one email (top above) I was not acting in the capacity of a supervisor and therefor no legal representation will be provided to me....WHICH IS SCHNEE LEGAL SERVICES? See anything in here that is Attorney Client Privilege ? This was additional nonsense communications that Schnee Legal Services considers attorney client privilege. This prompted the email in question....all around the second ridiculous censure. Here is where he mentions the crime code......then seems to forget Schnee Legal Services, a contractor with Exeter Township convince's the BOS to file an "Injunctive Relief" case on 9/11/23. Schnee Legal Service contends I do not warrant legal counsel claiming my actions were not as a supervisor. Here is what stated it all....The illegal removal, the second ridiculous censure and claim that I disrupted the meeting by simply attempting to point out that the Treasury Report should be under the Approvals with Minutes and Disbursement as it has been for several decades.....Bell and Vollmer are not your leaders J. Chadwick Schnee, Esquire (PA 306907). Schnee Legal Services, LLC J. Chadwick Schnee, Esq. SchneeLegal Services Schnee LEGAL SERVICES
0 Comments
Categories
All
Archives
July 2024
|